<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exhausted&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/</link>
	<description>web apps, programming talk, and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>&quot;We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil&quot; - Sir Tony Hoare

It&#039;s an interesting quote, however, I think people misuse it. I always review the code that I write and optimize where I can without complicating things. Good design is important, and if you&#039;re making major changes to your design when you optimize you obviously did not spend enough time planning out your design.

That is, however, not what I did when I optimized the code. I looked over things and noticed a few places where I was needlessly recalculating things. So I removed them or moved them out of for loops. This significantly sped up the generation time for certain fonts.

Personally, I believe any good software person should review their code after they write it. I don&#039;t think anyone can write perfect code all the time on their first try. And if they claim to do that, they&#039;re just full of BS. Reviewing your code and fixing up certain areas is a good policy. It&#039;ll result in better performance and a better end result for the program user. 

Interesting article on the subject:
http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil&#8221; &#8211; Sir Tony Hoare</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting quote, however, I think people misuse it. I always review the code that I write and optimize where I can without complicating things. Good design is important, and if you&#8217;re making major changes to your design when you optimize you obviously did not spend enough time planning out your design.</p>
<p>That is, however, not what I did when I optimized the code. I looked over things and noticed a few places where I was needlessly recalculating things. So I removed them or moved them out of for loops. This significantly sped up the generation time for certain fonts.</p>
<p>Personally, I believe any good software person should review their code after they write it. I don&#8217;t think anyone can write perfect code all the time on their first try. And if they claim to do that, they&#8217;re just full of BS. Reviewing your code and fixing up certain areas is a good policy. It&#8217;ll result in better performance and a better end result for the program user. </p>
<p>Interesting article on the subject:<br />
<a href="http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.acm.org/ubiquity/views/v7i24_fallacy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Premature optimization is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Premature optimization is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up on the TRaC font. I edited it a little before I posted it up, but it appears to still be a little messed up. Though I think it&#039;ll be impossible to completely fix. If you type in one letter repeatedly (say 10 times), the letter will eventually end up looking like crap. It&#039;s a cool looking font, but the author didn&#039;t set it up correctly, or it may be that it&#039;s impossible to correctly align that font, so he/she left it flawed.

A book on PHP really isn&#039;t necessary unless you&#039;re going to be doing some heavy duty stuff or some database work. I actually don&#039;t own one (though I may look into getting one). I just took a few tutorials online and use the online documentation to look up the information I need. I know what you mean about not wanting to get into another language though. I think sometimes I try to do too much stuff at once and then end up not doing much at all (example: last Fall I picked a book on LISP and Java EE, I’ve only read a little from each one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up on the TRaC font. I edited it a little before I posted it up, but it appears to still be a little messed up. Though I think it&#8217;ll be impossible to completely fix. If you type in one letter repeatedly (say 10 times), the letter will eventually end up looking like crap. It&#8217;s a cool looking font, but the author didn&#8217;t set it up correctly, or it may be that it&#8217;s impossible to correctly align that font, so he/she left it flawed.</p>
<p>A book on PHP really isn&#8217;t necessary unless you&#8217;re going to be doing some heavy duty stuff or some database work. I actually don&#8217;t own one (though I may look into getting one). I just took a few tutorials online and use the online documentation to look up the information I need. I know what you mean about not wanting to get into another language though. I think sometimes I try to do too much stuff at once and then end up not doing much at all (example: last Fall I picked a book on LISP and Java EE, I’ve only read a little from each one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome AnDrEw</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome AnDrEw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/06/23/exhausted/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait to see what else you have in store for everyone. I thought about picking up a book on PHP today at Barnes And Noble, but I decided I don&#039;t want to get into another programming language since it&#039;ll most likely just be a bother. On TAAG the AOL font &quot;TRaC&quot; needs a little work, because it doesn&#039;t place some of the characters on the last line correctly. Other than that I&#039;ll probably use it a lot as I enjoy using ASCII art for a lot of my files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see what else you have in store for everyone. I thought about picking up a book on PHP today at Barnes And Noble, but I decided I don&#8217;t want to get into another programming language since it&#8217;ll most likely just be a bother. On TAAG the AOL font &#8220;TRaC&#8221; needs a little work, because it doesn&#8217;t place some of the characters on the last line correctly. Other than that I&#8217;ll probably use it a lot as I enjoy using ASCII art for a lot of my files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

