<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Year End Review: The patorjk.com Comeback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/</link>
	<description>web apps, programming talk, and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4843</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 01:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4843</guid>
		<description>Possibly, I haven&#039;t really kept up with the .NET stuff. Though I know when I pick a language it&#039;s usually because it provides some type of advantage over another language. There are things I can do in Tcl that I can&#039;t do in VB and vice versa. Sometimes speed of execution is an issue, sometimes I just want to whip up something really quickly, etc etc.

If all languages had the same features and pros/cons, and the only difference was syntax, I&#039;m not sure there&#039;d be a good reason to use than one of them.

I did a little more digging and it looks like most sites say syntax is the main difference (though C# has features that are difficult to do in VB.NET). However, someone ran some tests and it looks like there are speed differences in the code that&#039;s generated:

http://www.osnews.com/story.php/5602/Nine-Language-Performance-Round-up-Benchmarking-Math-and-File-IO//page3

I&#039;m guessing they still have multiple languages so C/C++ programmers and VB programmers don&#039;t have to learn a completely new syntax to pick up the .NET language. It makes since from a marketing perspective, but it seems a little odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly, I haven&#8217;t really kept up with the .NET stuff. Though I know when I pick a language it&#8217;s usually because it provides some type of advantage over another language. There are things I can do in Tcl that I can&#8217;t do in VB and vice versa. Sometimes speed of execution is an issue, sometimes I just want to whip up something really quickly, etc etc.</p>
<p>If all languages had the same features and pros/cons, and the only difference was syntax, I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;d be a good reason to use than one of them.</p>
<p>I did a little more digging and it looks like most sites say syntax is the main difference (though C# has features that are difficult to do in VB.NET). However, someone ran some tests and it looks like there are speed differences in the code that&#8217;s generated:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.osnews.com/story.php/5602/Nine-Language-Performance-Round-up-Benchmarking-Math-and-File-IO//page3" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story.php/5602/Nine-Language-Performance-Round-up-Benchmarking-Math-and-File-IO//page3</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing they still have multiple languages so C/C++ programmers and VB programmers don&#8217;t have to learn a completely new syntax to pick up the .NET language. It makes since from a marketing perspective, but it seems a little odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome AnDrEw</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4842</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome AnDrEw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4842</guid>
		<description>Sorry I&#039;m not too keen on the subject, but wasn&#039;t that what the purpose of the .NET framework was? I thought it was for having multiple languages that could easily produce the same results, using similar syntax, which could be applied to any of the other languages in the suite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I&#8217;m not too keen on the subject, but wasn&#8217;t that what the purpose of the .NET framework was? I thought it was for having multiple languages that could easily produce the same results, using similar syntax, which could be applied to any of the other languages in the suite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4840</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4840</guid>
		<description>It seems kind of odd that you&#039;d have a suite of languages and the only difference would be syntax. Good to know though. I&#039;ll probably check out both C# and VB and just go with whatever one is easiest to write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems kind of odd that you&#8217;d have a suite of languages and the only difference would be syntax. Good to know though. I&#8217;ll probably check out both C# and VB and just go with whatever one is easiest to write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloat</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4826</link>
		<dc:creator>sloat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4826</guid>
		<description>I had to use VB.NET 2k3 for a class and I found it to be much more verbose than C#. Or at least that&#039;s what it felt like.

But, other than syntax, there&#039;s no difference between the managed .net languages. They all produce the same output. C++ is still my favorite for unmanaged code out of the .net languages. It&#039;s kind of ugly with managed code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to use VB.NET 2k3 for a class and I found it to be much more verbose than C#. Or at least that&#8217;s what it felt like.</p>
<p>But, other than syntax, there&#8217;s no difference between the managed .net languages. They all produce the same output. C++ is still my favorite for unmanaged code out of the .net languages. It&#8217;s kind of ugly with managed code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4825</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4825</guid>
		<description>Actually, it looks like the express editions are out now:

http://www.microsoft.com/express/product/default.aspx

I might check out the VB one tonight. I&#039;ve been wanting to learn C#, but I&#039;m not sure I want to get caught up in trying to learn too many different things right now. Unless C# is amazingly better than the new VB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it looks like the express editions are out now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/express/product/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/express/product/default.aspx</a></p>
<p>I might check out the VB one tonight. I&#8217;ve been wanting to learn C#, but I&#8217;m not sure I want to get caught up in trying to learn too many different things right now. Unless C# is amazingly better than the new VB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome AnDrEw</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4815</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome AnDrEw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4815</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read the newest version of Visual Studio is due out sometime during the summer, but for now I&#039;ll stick with 2005. Although it has many handy features, and supports Regular Expressions better than Visual Basic 6 I find that the code runs a lot slower, and I&#039;m still not sure how to create simultaneous connections like using an array of Winsock controls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read the newest version of Visual Studio is due out sometime during the summer, but for now I&#8217;ll stick with 2005. Although it has many handy features, and supports Regular Expressions better than Visual Basic 6 I find that the code runs a lot slower, and I&#8217;m still not sure how to create simultaneous connections like using an array of Winsock controls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>As of this writing, it&#039;s had 15 downloads this month (over the last 2.5 days). I&#039;m not sure who uses it. I use it every so often when I need some VB6 work done. I actually think the audience for VB6 is grossly underestimated. Though I know some people use it because it can do things like &quot;hide windows&quot; or &quot;enable disabled objects&quot;. I actually thought about writing a program specifically for doing things like that, but I&#039;ve been side tracked. 

I&#039;ll have to look into the Express Editions of Visual Studio. I have version 2003, but I&#039;m not sure if I want to start there since it&#039;s already a little dated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of this writing, it&#8217;s had 15 downloads this month (over the last 2.5 days). I&#8217;m not sure who uses it. I use it every so often when I need some VB6 work done. I actually think the audience for VB6 is grossly underestimated. Though I know some people use it because it can do things like &#8220;hide windows&#8221; or &#8220;enable disabled objects&#8221;. I actually thought about writing a program specifically for doing things like that, but I&#8217;ve been side tracked. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to look into the Express Editions of Visual Studio. I have version 2003, but I&#8217;m not sure if I want to start there since it&#8217;s already a little dated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloat</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4813</link>
		<dc:creator>sloat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4813</guid>
		<description>I always hate it when I put a lot of effort in to something and no one gives a crap about it. But I guess the important thing is that you&#039;re happy with it the way it is. If other people like it, that&#039;s just a plus.

It&#039;s weird that people still talk about (and presumably use) the API spy. Could it really still be useful?

It&#039;s cool that you&#039;re gonna get back in to Windows programming. Don&#039;t forget that you can get the express editions of visual studio for free now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always hate it when I put a lot of effort in to something and no one gives a crap about it. But I guess the important thing is that you&#8217;re happy with it the way it is. If other people like it, that&#8217;s just a plus.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s weird that people still talk about (and presumably use) the API spy. Could it really still be useful?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cool that you&#8217;re gonna get back in to Windows programming. Don&#8217;t forget that you can get the express editions of visual studio for free now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>hehe, thanks for further confirming that for me. I can actually track how often people change fonts because each font change causes a hit to the getFontInfo.php file. I actually wondered if the Standard font wasn&#039;t impressing enough people so I changed it to the Dancing Font. The next day I noticed an increase in the number of hits to getFontInfo.php, and it stayed that way. I was kind of shocked that it made such a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, thanks for further confirming that for me. I can actually track how often people change fonts because each font change causes a hit to the getFontInfo.php file. I actually wondered if the Standard font wasn&#8217;t impressing enough people so I changed it to the Dancing Font. The next day I noticed an increase in the number of hits to getFontInfo.php, and it stayed that way. I was kind of shocked that it made such a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awesome AnDrEw</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/comment-page-1/#comment-4780</link>
		<dc:creator>Awesome AnDrEw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2007/12/31/year-end-review-the-patorjkcom-comeback/#comment-4780</guid>
		<description>I think you are probably right about first impressions. When I used TAAG a few days ago to generate some ASCII art for a &quot;ReadMe&quot; file I immediately noticed the fact it was on a different font, and thought, &quot;This one looks pretty cool!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are probably right about first impressions. When I used TAAG a few days ago to generate some ASCII art for a &#8220;ReadMe&#8221; file I immediately noticed the fact it was on a different font, and thought, &#8220;This one looks pretty cool!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
