<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C#, wasting time, and hunting down AOL fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/</link>
	<description>web apps, programming talk, and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:45:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-4974</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/#comment-4974</guid>
		<description>make files and ant files can get kind of complicated. I&#039;ve worked on projects where I almost went nuts trying to figure out how the ant file was doing something (this was a situation where the file included files that included other files and so on). Though something like that might not be unavoidable in large projects.

Right now I&#039;m thinking I&#039;ll only use C# for Windows GUI apps, though that may change later down the line.

As a side note, header files annoy me. I&#039;m glad to see that C# doesn&#039;t have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>make files and ant files can get kind of complicated. I&#8217;ve worked on projects where I almost went nuts trying to figure out how the ant file was doing something (this was a situation where the file included files that included other files and so on). Though something like that might not be unavoidable in large projects.</p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m thinking I&#8217;ll only use C# for Windows GUI apps, though that may change later down the line.</p>
<p>As a side note, header files annoy me. I&#8217;m glad to see that C# doesn&#8217;t have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-4970</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/#comment-4970</guid>
		<description>C# is a decent language to learn. It&#039;s java with about 10% differences.  The things I like most about it are #region tags and object properties. C++ had me constantly writing code that should have been generated for me (getters, setters).  The tools for developing with it are Microsoft specific.  Visual Studios has limits and doesn&#039;t integrate well with Subversion source control.  The build tools that are associated with it aren&#039;t as simple as make or ANT though I am trying to find time to play with Nunit, and Nant.  Also it needs a &#039;Hibernate&#039;/&#039;Toplink&#039; like library for easy Data Access Layers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C# is a decent language to learn. It&#8217;s java with about 10% differences.  The things I like most about it are #region tags and object properties. C++ had me constantly writing code that should have been generated for me (getters, setters).  The tools for developing with it are Microsoft specific.  Visual Studios has limits and doesn&#8217;t integrate well with Subversion source control.  The build tools that are associated with it aren&#8217;t as simple as make or ANT though I am trying to find time to play with Nunit, and Nant.  Also it needs a &#8216;Hibernate&#8217;/'Toplink&#8217; like library for easy Data Access Layers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patorjk</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-4948</link>
		<dc:creator>patorjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/#comment-4948</guid>
		<description>AOL 4.0 was the last version I used, I still remember a ton of progs from that time period though. My neighbor was actually really into them at the time and he&#039;d send me the latest ones when he got them. I can even think of progs that that site is missing - Mad Cow and MIB.

When that friendship dissolved I basically stopped following them (this would be in mid or late 1998). I can only imagine that even more were made after that since the code to create everything was readily available on the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL 4.0 was the last version I used, I still remember a ton of progs from that time period though. My neighbor was actually really into them at the time and he&#8217;d send me the latest ones when he got them. I can even think of progs that that site is missing &#8211; Mad Cow and MIB.</p>
<p>When that friendship dissolved I basically stopped following them (this would be in mid or late 1998). I can only imagine that even more were made after that since the code to create everything was readily available on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloat</title>
		<link>http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-4947</link>
		<dc:creator>sloat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patorjk.com/blog/2008/01/14/c-wasting-time-and-hunting-down-aol-fonts/#comment-4947</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s crazy that there were actually THAT many progs. I really don&#039;t remember it being that prevalent.

Was it something that happened after AOL 4.0?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s crazy that there were actually THAT many progs. I really don&#8217;t remember it being that prevalent.</p>
<p>Was it something that happened after AOL 4.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
